Difference between revisions of "Urban development through cultural solutions"

From Urban Arena Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:


==Shapes, sizes and applications==
==Shapes, sizes and applications==
Cultural heritage is a regenerative opportunity for cities across Europe and worldwide. Just inside of ROCK there are seven “Role-model” (european) cities which built upon their cultural heritage to transform their respective cities.  Developing cities in accordance with the cultural heritage is thus a well developed approach which has shown to be successful.  
Cultural heritage is a regenerative opportunity for cities across Europe and worldwide. Just inside of ROCK there are seven “Role-model” (european) cities which built upon their cultural heritage to transform their respective cities.  Developing cities in accordance with the cultural heritage is thus very well developed and has shown to be successful.  


The idea is transferable though the cultural heritage of every city is obviously unique which means that there is not "one" concept of using "cultural heritage" that every city can apply. A common way to regenerate cultural heritage is through the renovation of old historic buildings. On a worldwide level, UNESCO honors sites/landmarks/areas with outstanding historic/cultural significance with the name “World Heritage Site”, so that they are protected by international treaties.
The idea is transferable though the cultural heritage of every city is obviously unique which means that there is not "one" concept of using "cultural heritage" that every city can apply. A common way to regenerate cultural heritage is through the renovation of old historic buildings. On a worldwide level, UNESCO honors sites/landmarks/areas with outstanding historic/cultural significance with the name “World Heritage Site”, so that they are protected by international treaties.

Revision as of 18:55, 31 October 2019

Urban development through cultural solutions is about using arts and cultural heritage (e.g museums, old industrial sites etc.) to develop (degraded) urban spaces.

This page is part of an ongoing, open-ended online collaborative database, which collects relevant approaches that can be used by city-makers to tackle unsustainability and injustice in cities. It is based mainly on knowledge generated in EU-funded projects and touches on fast changing fields. As such, this page makes no claims of authoritative completeness and welcomes your suggestions.

General introduction to approach

The approaches here work with multiple actors at multiple levels such as public administration, citizens and informal groups or private grant-making foundations. They are all centered around a paradigm of using cultural capital in order to develop the city. An important aspect is the idea of "regeneration" which aims at "restoring and improving the quality of urban life through the enhancement and development of the unique characteristics of a place and its people." [1]

Specific examples:

  • Regeneration and Optimisation of Cultural heritage in creative and Knowledge cities (ROCK) aims to develop an innovative, collaborative and systematic approach to promote the effective regeneration and adaptive reuse in historic city centres by implementing a repertoire of successful heritage-led regeneration initiatives related to 7 Role Model selected cities: Athens, Cluj-Napoca, Eindhoven, Liverpool, Lyon, Turin and Vilnius. The insight gained by this will be used in three 3 Replicator Cities: Bologna, Lisbon and Skopje to achieve regeneration, sustainable development and economic growth of the city. [2]
  • Impact of the Third Sector as SOcial INnovation (ITSSOIN) analyzed how culture-led place rejuvenation in degraded urban spaces in the periphery of the cities of Milan, Rotterdam, Greater Paris region & Galicia (Spain) relates to social cohesion. It specifically explores how civic engagement in the field of culture and arts contributes to the expressive, communicative, recreational, and spiritual needs of individuals and communities.[3]

Shapes, sizes and applications

Cultural heritage is a regenerative opportunity for cities across Europe and worldwide. Just inside of ROCK there are seven “Role-model” (european) cities which built upon their cultural heritage to transform their respective cities. Developing cities in accordance with the cultural heritage is thus very well developed and has shown to be successful.

The idea is transferable though the cultural heritage of every city is obviously unique which means that there is not "one" concept of using "cultural heritage" that every city can apply. A common way to regenerate cultural heritage is through the renovation of old historic buildings. On a worldwide level, UNESCO honors sites/landmarks/areas with outstanding historic/cultural significance with the name “World Heritage Site”, so that they are protected by international treaties.

Relation to UrbanA themes: Cities, sustainability, and justice

This is strictly about urban areas. “Cultural heritage as urban regeneration” looks at city centres (mostly because there is generally a richer heritage than in peripheries), “Culture-led Place Rejuvenation” looks at degraded urban spaces in the periphery of cities (mostly because of the availability of spaces in the periphery)

Renewing city parts with the aim of cultural vibrance can contribute to sustainability, but not necessarily does (questionable case: The Olympic Games in Turin (2006) are mentioned (inside the ROCK project) as a "great international event" that helped to create "a new culture & knowledge-led identity"[4] for the city. “The reuse of the heritage in the central districts combined with physical regeneration, great international events (e.g. 2006 Winter Olympics) and the development of a strong, long-term publicly-led cultural policy, contributed to boost an overall and wider redevelopment process.” It is at least questionable though if Olympic Games can actually actively contribute to environmentally sustainable cities. (or if they can just be planned in a less harmful way) Cultural vibrancy in cities is enhanced through procedural justice and justice as recognition. The approaches seem to address justice issues, though often only implicitly in a way that they want to enhance the cultural vibrancy of a city. And different aspects can be addressed in different ways. The different case studies of the projects are therefore paying respect to justice issues on different levels. In Kluj (ROCK), for example, the “model depends on a participatory approach, consisting of local administration, policy makers, industry, research, NGOs and associations strongly committed to the priority projects for heritage regeneration, reinvention of historical centre and redevelopment of the city’s backbone to create a sustainable and equitable solution to address the community's needs.” This reflects attention to “procedural justice” issues in Kluj.

Culture-led rejuvenation (ITSSOIN) wants to explicitly pay attention to justice aspects (e.g the inclusion of socially disadvantaged groups, strengthening their feeling of belonging to a community and stimulating their active participation and involvement in the life of a community) In Eindhoven (ROCK), however, it is more about the reputation of the city: “Eindhoven generated a Living Lab in the former industrial regeneration area called ‘Strijp-S’ […]. The Living Lab generates economic, cultural and technological initiatives that contribute to strengthening identity and the significance of the Strijp-S as the center of Brainport Region Eindhoven, to promote its (inter)national reputation and the rediscovery of the place for industrial heritage”[5] There may be ambivalent justice aspects if the goal of an instance is to better the image of a city, not least with regards to gentrification effects (e.g. making housing unaffordable for certain income groups due to an improved image of the areas). There is a high potential here for unintended injustices.

"Cultural heritage as urban regeneration" links sustainability and justice [6]: “Environmental sustainability is a golden thread throughout the ROCK project as urban regeneration efforts are intrinsically linked to attempts to minimize our impact on the environment – whether through the creative and adaptive reuse of built heritage, the circular model approaches to improve well-being, the use of inclusive and participatory approaches to involve citizens in co-designing solutions, or efforts to contribute to the resilience of communities to climate change.” It very much depends on the single case if justice and sustainability are linked in an instance. As mentioned the Olympic games in Turin led to the city successfully reshaping its image [7], the "work in progress"(building) period of the games led to negative air qualities at that time though.[8] As with most city development strategies using culture to develop the city can be done in more or less environmentally harmful ways.

Narrative of change

Geographically this adresses degraded (built) parts of the city that can be renewed through cultural activities and infrastructure. This renewal and strengthened ties of identity are expected to contribute to better quality of life for residents. An advantage of using the cultural heritage of a city is that citizens can accept new developments more easily if they relate to some cultural heritage. Providing spaces and opportunities for civic artistic activities as a way of community building and empowerment is a different rationale, which is partly mobilized by ITSSOIN too.

Transformative potential

Activities of urban renewal with reference to cultural heritage may have very diverse impacts on power relations. If designed as participatory processes as e.g done in Kluj (next chapter), they add to procedural justice and a sense of community among residents. However, overall positive outcomes (contributions to more just and sustainable cities) seem rather unlikely as long as a tendency to large events and infrastructures prevails and as long as gentrification effects are not effectively mitigated against. (see e.g high rent prices for apartments in the quarter Strijp S in Eindhoven[9]

Illustration

A case study of the ROCK - project is the city of Cluj, which is one of the seven role-model cities for using cultural heritage as city development strategy. The model ‘COM’ON Cluj-Napoca’ is based on the process of brokering between public and private stakeholders enabling an open and cooperative environment, raising community trust and encouraging civic involvement by offering citizens the opportunity to become active participants in the life of their own community. The goal is to involve citizens in a democratic deliberation and decision process for determining the best way to spend part of the public budget (participative youth budgeting). It very much therefore pays respect to justice as recognition and procedural justice aspects. ‘COM’ON Cluj-Napoca depends on a participatory approach, consisting of local administration, policy makers, industry, research, NGOs and associations strongly committed to the priority projects for heritage regeneration, reinvention of historical centre and redevelopment of the city’s backbone to create a sustainable and equitable solution to address the community's needs.“[10]

References