Difference between revisions of "Talk:(Impact) evaluation and assessment framework"

From Urban Arena Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
To what extent are evaluation and assessment frameworks actually used to make cities more sustainable and just?  
To what extent are evaluation and assessment frameworks actually used to make cities more sustainable and just? Do city-makers consider their outputs valuable and useful, or are they frequently overlooked in city-making processes? For different types of city-makers (e.g. policy-makers vs. community leaders) are there discrepancies regarding access to and usefulness of evaluation and assessment frameworks? [[User:Sophia Silverton|Sophia Silverton]] ([[User talk:Sophia Silverton|talk]]) 02:52, 8 November 2019 (CST)
 
Do city-makers consider their outputs valuable and useful, or are they frequently overlooked in city-making processes?  
 
For different types of city-makers (e.g. policy-makers vs. community leaders) are there discrepancies regarding access to and usefulness of evaluation and assessment frameworks?

Latest revision as of 10:53, 8 November 2019

To what extent are evaluation and assessment frameworks actually used to make cities more sustainable and just? Do city-makers consider their outputs valuable and useful, or are they frequently overlooked in city-making processes? For different types of city-makers (e.g. policy-makers vs. community leaders) are there discrepancies regarding access to and usefulness of evaluation and assessment frameworks? Sophia Silverton (talk) 02:52, 8 November 2019 (CST)