Regeneration of a deprived neighborhood in Rotterdam - Revision history

Romane Joly at 08:28, 16 March 2021

2021-03-16T08:28:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:28, 16 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This intervention has been translated into a brief governance scenario. Take a look at [[Nurturing Trust in Community-Driven Regeneration: Continuity amidst Institutional Uncertainty]].		This intervention has been translated into a brief governance scenario. Take a look at [[Nurturing Trust in Community-Driven Regeneration: Continuity amidst Institutional Uncertainty]].

	You read this description and want to hear more about this case? Get in touch! Contact [https://drift.eur.nl/people/frank-van-steenbergen/ \|Franck van Steenbergen] for more information.		You read this description and want to hear more about this case? Get in touch! Contact [https://drift.eur.nl/people/frank-van-steenbergen/\| Franck van Steenbergen] for more information.

	{{toclimit\|limit=2}}		{{toclimit\|limit=2}}

Romane Joly at 08:28, 16 March 2021

2021-03-16T08:28:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:28, 16 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This intervention has been translated into a brief governance scenario. Take a look at [[Nurturing Trust in Community-Driven Regeneration: Continuity amidst Institutional Uncertainty]].		This intervention has been translated into a brief governance scenario. Take a look at [[Nurturing Trust in Community-Driven Regeneration: Continuity amidst Institutional Uncertainty]].

	You read this description and want to hear more about this case? Get in touch! Contact Franck van Steenbergen for more information.		You read this description and want to hear more about this case? Get in touch! Contact [https://drift.eur.nl/people/frank-van-steenbergen/ \|Franck van Steenbergen] for more information.

	{{toclimit\|limit=2}}		{{toclimit\|limit=2}}

Sophia McRae at 10:43, 5 March 2021

2021-03-05T10:43:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:43, 5 March 2021
Line 437:		Line 437:

	The biggest takeaway from such a Resilience Lab or neighborhood redevelopment is to aim to the autonomy and sovereignty of the residents and the people involved. Such interventions have to be context specific, have a sense of freedom in developing your activities in practices to support learning by doing (interview with F.).		The biggest takeaway from such a Resilience Lab or neighborhood redevelopment is to aim to the autonomy and sovereignty of the residents and the people involved. Such interventions have to be context specific, have a sense of freedom in developing your activities in practices to support learning by doing (interview with F.).

			'''Have questions or comments? Contact information regarding this case can be found at the top of this page!'''

	== Appendix 1: Three modes of governance ==		== Appendix 1: Three modes of governance ==

Romane Joly at 13:16, 4 March 2021

2021-03-04T13:16:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:16, 4 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This intervention has been translated into a brief governance scenario. Take a look at [[Nurturing Trust in Community-Driven Regeneration: Continuity amidst Institutional Uncertainty]].		This intervention has been translated into a brief governance scenario. Take a look at [[Nurturing Trust in Community-Driven Regeneration: Continuity amidst Institutional Uncertainty]].

			You read this description and want to hear more about this case? Get in touch! Contact Franck van Steenbergen for more information.

	{{toclimit\|limit=2}}		{{toclimit\|limit=2}}
	== a) Basic characteristics and ambitions of the intervention ==		== a) Basic characteristics and ambitions of the intervention ==

Sophia McRae at 09:17, 4 March 2021

2021-03-04T09:17:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:17, 4 March 2021
Line 29:		Line 29:
	The intervention is characterized by a hybrid governance mode that includes the partners of the Resilience Lab (civil society organization, research institute), the municipality, and the local citizens.		The intervention is characterized by a hybrid governance mode that includes the partners of the Resilience Lab (civil society organization, research institute), the municipality, and the local citizens.

	==='''6. Why do you consider it worthwhile to study and share experiences made in the context of this governance intervention for sustainable and just cities?<ref>Background to this question: Our four main criteria for selecting particular governance interventions and develop rich descriptions of them were: A) The intervention has been studied in a specific urban context (e.g. city), B) this context is located in Europe (and, preferably, the study was EU-funded), C) the intervention considers to a large extent sustainability AND justice (at least implicitly), and D) it is well-documented, ideally including assumptions or even critical reflections on enablers and barriers to implementation and on transferability (i.e. ‘de-contextualizability’). Additionally, we aimed at a diverse portfolio of domains (see Q2.) and governance modes (see Q5): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nCPcUd-COIQ1MsBjir20_F1CBbnSu6HqKH9nNLshiVQ/edit?usp=sharing.</ref> ===		==='''6. Why do you consider it worthwhile to study and share experiences made in the context of this governance intervention for sustainable and just cities?<ref>Background to this question: Our four main criteria for selecting particular governance interventions and develop rich descriptions of them were: A) The intervention has been studied in a specific urban context (e.g. city), B) this context is located in Europe (and, preferably, the study was EU-funded), C) the intervention considers to a large extent sustainability AND justice (at least implicitly), and D) it is well-documented, ideally including assumptions or even critical reflections on enablers and barriers to implementation and on transferability (i.e. ‘de-contextualizability’). Additionally, we aimed at a diverse portfolio of domains (see Q2.) and governance modes (see Q5): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nCPcUd-COIQ1MsBjir20_F1CBbnSu6HqKH9nNLshiVQ/edit?usp=sharing.</ref> '''===

	This is a relevant example of governance intervention that addresses the second order of learning, i.e. aiming to structurally change the governance arrangements in urban regeneration projects (interview with F.).		This is a relevant example of governance intervention that addresses the second order of learning, i.e. aiming to structurally change the governance arrangements in urban regeneration projects (interview with F.).
Line 403:		Line 403:
	The limit to transferability would not take the Resilience Lab as an integrative project, rather to replicate the different activities within it e.g. related to education, green space etc.. Lacking an overarching and integrated vision of neighborhood transition management would limit the success of such intervention (Interview with F.).		The limit to transferability would not take the Resilience Lab as an integrative project, rather to replicate the different activities within it e.g. related to education, green space etc.. Lacking an overarching and integrated vision of neighborhood transition management would limit the success of such intervention (Interview with F.).

	==='''32. In what forms has the learning process, including stories of overcoming obstacles, been recorded for, and/or made accessible to city makers also from elsewhere?<ref>Feel free to include learning that has been made available through EU project documentation, intervention initiatives, or other channels. In addition to the forms in which the learning process has been shared with others, please indicate whether the learning process that’s being shared has been recorded in a self-critical/reflexive way.</ref> ===		==='''32. In what forms has the learning process, including stories of overcoming obstacles, been recorded for, and/or made accessible to city makers also from elsewhere?<ref>Feel free to include learning that has been made available through EU project documentation, intervention initiatives, or other channels. In addition to the forms in which the learning process has been shared with others, please indicate whether the learning process that’s being shared has been recorded in a self-critical/reflexive way.</ref> '''===

	The project has been disseminated.		The project has been disseminated.

Sophia McRae at 11:57, 17 February 2021

2021-02-17T11:57:48Z

Show changes

Sophia McRae at 12:59, 6 January 2021

2021-01-06T12:59:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:59, 6 January 2021
Line 45:		Line 45:
	*'''a. Has the intervention been developed or studied in the context of an (EU-funded?) project? (please name the project, its duration and include a link to the project website here).'''		*'''a. Has the intervention been developed or studied in the context of an (EU-funded?) project? (please name the project, its duration and include a link to the project website here).'''

	The intervention has been developed and primarily funded by the Dutch Ministry within the framework of a national program aiming to regenerate deprived neighborhoods in the south of Rotterdam. The project was developed by a consortium (see Q. 10) ~~of four partners~~. One of them, the Dutch Research Institute for Transitions (DRIFT) related the intervention to EU-funded project InContext (2010-13) (not included in UrbanA WP4 database) ~~that allowed them to translate and apply a methodology for transition management at the neighborhood scale~~. Incontext investigates the conditions for creating sustainability transitions at the local and individual levels. Carnisse neighborhood was the 1st pilot project of InContext.<ref>InContext website. Last view on 26/06/20: https://www.incontext-fp7.eu/		The intervention has been developed and primarily funded by the Dutch Ministry within the framework of a national program aiming to regenerate deprived neighborhoods in the south of Rotterdam. The project was developed by a consortium of four partners (see Q. 10). One of them, the Dutch Research Institute for Transitions (DRIFT) related the intervention to the EU-funded project InContext (2010-13) (not included in UrbanA WP4 database). Incontext investigates the conditions for creating sustainability transitions at the local and individual levels. Carnisse neighborhood was the 1st pilot project of InContext.<ref>InContext website. Last view on 26/06/20: https://www.incontext-fp7.eu/
	.</ref>		.</ref>

Sophia McRae at 13:17, 23 December 2020

2020-12-23T13:17:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:17, 23 December 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This intervention has been translated into a brief governance scenario. Take a look at [[~~Trusting civil society and residents to co-shape regeneration projects~~ in ~~deprived neighborhoods \| '''Trusting civil society and residents to co~~-~~shape regeneration projects in deprived neighborhoods'''~~]].		This intervention has been translated into a brief governance scenario. Take a look at [[Nurturing Trust in Community-Driven Regeneration: Continuity amidst Institutional Uncertainty]].

	== a) Basic characteristics and ambitions of the intervention ==		== a) Basic characteristics and ambitions of the intervention ==

Sophia McRae at 20:03, 23 November 2020

2020-11-23T20:03:41Z

Show changes

Romane Joly: /* a) Basic characteristics and ambitions of the intervention */

2020-10-23T14:08:21Z

a) Basic characteristics and ambitions of the intervention

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:08, 23 October 2020
Line 37:		Line 37:
	*GUST_05_Frantzeskaki_Lab Rotterdam		*GUST_05_Frantzeskaki_Lab Rotterdam
	*add to GUST_(InContext) Wittmayer and al. Transition Management in Urban Neighborhood		*add to GUST_(InContext) Wittmayer and al. Transition Management in Urban Neighborhood
	*Interview with ~~Frank van Steenbergen~~, researcher ~~at Drift~~, ~~member of the UrbanA consortium~~.		*Interview with F., researcher, (16.06.20)

	== b) Additional basic characteristics, links to earlier UrbanA work ==		== b) Additional basic characteristics, links to earlier UrbanA work ==