Holistic neighbourhood development Augustenborg - Revision history

Jakob Kramer: /* 12. Who else is (going to be) involved in the intervention, and what was/is their main role? */

2021-03-14T12:12:26Z

12. Who else is (going to be) involved in the intervention, and what was/is their main role?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 14 March 2021
Line 197:		Line 197:
	\| For profit entreprises		\| For profit entreprises
	\| Yes		\| Yes
	\| Several private companies and local businesses		\| Several private companies and local businesses as well as The Swedish energy company Sydkraft
	as well as The Swedish energy company Sydkraft
	\|-		\|-
	\| Local/regional government		\| Local/regional government

Jakob Kramer: /* 12. Who else is (going to be) involved in the intervention, and what was/is their main role? */

2021-03-14T12:12:14Z

12. Who else is (going to be) involved in the intervention, and what was/is their main role?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 14 March 2021
Line 152:		Line 152:
	\|-		\|-
	\| Academic organizations		\| Academic organizations
	\|		\| Yes
	\|		\| University of Malmö
	\|-		\|-
	\| Religious organizations		\| Religious organizations
Line 196:		Line 196:
	\|-		\|-
	\| For profit entreprises		\| For profit entreprises
	\|		\| Yes
	\|		\| Several private companies and local businesses
			as well as The Swedish energy company Sydkraft
	\|-		\|-
	\| Local/regional government		\| Local/regional government
	\|		\| Yes
	\|		\| The City of Malmö, represented by the Fosie district and the Service Department
	\|-		\|-
	\| Regional organizations		\| Regional organizations
Line 220:		Line 221:
	\|-		\|-
	\| Other initiatives		\| Other initiatives
	\|		\| Yes
	\|		\| School managers
	\|}		\|}

Jakob Kramer: /* 9. Problematization and priority: */

2021-03-14T12:10:41Z

9. Problematization and priority:

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 14 March 2021
Line 98:		Line 98:
	\| style="text-align:left;" \| 2. [[Material and livelihood inequalities \| Material and livelihood inequalities]]		\| style="text-align:left;" \| 2. [[Material and livelihood inequalities \| Material and livelihood inequalities]]
	\|		\|
	\|		\| X
	\|-		\|-
	\| style="text-align:left;" \| 3. [[Racialized or ethnically exclusionary urbanization \| Racialized or ethnically exclusionary urbanization]]		\| style="text-align:left;" \| 3. [[Racialized or ethnically exclusionary urbanization \| Racialized or ethnically exclusionary urbanization]]
Line 110:		Line 110:
	\| style="text-align:left;" \| 5. [[Uneven environmental health and pollution patterns\|Uneven environmental health and pollution patterns]]		\| style="text-align:left;" \| 5. [[Uneven environmental health and pollution patterns\|Uneven environmental health and pollution patterns]]
	\|		\|
	\|		\| X
	\|-		\|-
	\| style="text-align:left;" \| 6. [[Unfit institutional structures \| Unfit institutional structures]]		\| style="text-align:left;" \| 6. [[Unfit institutional structures \| Unfit institutional structures]]
Line 130:		Line 130:
	\| style="text-align:left;" \| 10. [[Weak(ened) civil society \| Weak(ened) civil society]]		\| style="text-align:left;" \| 10. [[Weak(ened) civil society \| Weak(ened) civil society]]
	\|		\|
	\|		\| X
	\|}		\|}

Sophia McRae at 09:17, 4 March 2021

2021-03-04T09:17:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:17, 4 March 2021
Line 39:		Line 39:
	It is '''government-led''' but characterized by its strong community engagement with a shift of responsibilities to community members later in the project, arguably developing into a more '''hybrid''' mode of governance.		It is '''government-led''' but characterized by its strong community engagement with a shift of responsibilities to community members later in the project, arguably developing into a more '''hybrid''' mode of governance.

	==='''6. Why do you consider it worthwhile to study and share experiences made in the context of this governance intervention for sustainable and just cities?<ref>Background to this question: Our four main criteria for selecting particular governance interventions and develop rich descriptions of them were: A) The intervention has been studied in a specific urban context (e.g. city), B) this context is located in Europe (and, preferably, the study was EU-funded), C) the intervention considers to a large extent sustainability AND justice (at least implicitly), and D) it is well-documented, ideally including assumptions or even critical reflections on enablers and barriers to implementation and on transferability (i.e. ‘de-contextualizability’). Additionally, we aimed at a diverse portfolio of domains (see Q2.) and governance modes (see Q5): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nCPcUd-COIQ1MsBjir20_F1CBbnSu6HqKH9nNLshiVQ/edit?usp=sharing.</ref> ===		==='''6. Why do you consider it worthwhile to study and share experiences made in the context of this governance intervention for sustainable and just cities?<ref>Background to this question: Our four main criteria for selecting particular governance interventions and develop rich descriptions of them were: A) The intervention has been studied in a specific urban context (e.g. city), B) this context is located in Europe (and, preferably, the study was EU-funded), C) the intervention considers to a large extent sustainability AND justice (at least implicitly), and D) it is well-documented, ideally including assumptions or even critical reflections on enablers and barriers to implementation and on transferability (i.e. ‘de-contextualizability’). Additionally, we aimed at a diverse portfolio of domains (see Q2.) and governance modes (see Q5): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nCPcUd-COIQ1MsBjir20_F1CBbnSu6HqKH9nNLshiVQ/edit?usp=sharing.</ref> '''===

	The intervention has been studied in an urban context in Europe and is at its core about sustainability, while also considering different dimensions of justice. There is a lot of media attention and documentation by SMARTEES is extensive (see Question 8a). Developing a neighbourhood in a holistic, integrative way is crucial, as it aims at breaking down institutional logics and compartmentalized policymaking, leading to more sustainable and just outcomes.		The intervention has been studied in an urban context in Europe and is at its core about sustainability, while also considering different dimensions of justice. There is a lot of media attention and documentation by SMARTEES is extensive (see Question 8a). Developing a neighbourhood in a holistic, integrative way is crucial, as it aims at breaking down institutional logics and compartmentalized policymaking, leading to more sustainable and just outcomes.
Line 491:		Line 491:


	==='''32. In what forms has the learning process, including stories of overcoming obstacles, been recorded for, and/or made accessible to city makers also from elsewhere?<ref>Feel free to include learning that has been made available through EU project documentation, intervention initiatives, or other channels. In addition to the forms in which the learning process has been shared with others, please indicate whether the learning process that’s being shared has been recorded in a self-critical/reflexive way.</ref> ===		==='''32. In what forms has the learning process, including stories of overcoming obstacles, been recorded for, and/or made accessible to city makers also from elsewhere?<ref>Feel free to include learning that has been made available through EU project documentation, intervention initiatives, or other channels. In addition to the forms in which the learning process has been shared with others, please indicate whether the learning process that’s being shared has been recorded in a self-critical/reflexive way.</ref> '''===

	The Municipal Housing company has published an online document which gives a lot of insight “behind the scenes” and shows their motivation behind the project in its different aspects.		The Municipal Housing company has published an online document which gives a lot of insight “behind the scenes” and shows their motivation behind the project in its different aspects.

Sophia McRae at 11:38, 17 February 2021

2021-02-17T11:38:18Z

Show changes

Sophia Silverton: /* c) Actor constellations */

2021-01-22T15:38:44Z

c) Actor constellations

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 22 January 2021
Line 229:		Line 229:
	Peter Lindhqvist from The Service Department, City of Malmö		Peter Lindhqvist from The Service Department, City of Malmö
	Bertil Nilsson, former headmaster at the school in Augustenborg		Bertil Nilsson, former headmaster at the school in Augustenborg
	Christer Sandgren at MKB		Christer Sandgren and MKB
	Trevor Graham, project leader since 1998		Trevor Graham, project leader since 1998

Jakob Kramer: /* a) Basic characteristics and ambitions of the intervention */

2021-01-14T10:24:49Z

a) Basic characteristics and ambitions of the intervention

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:24, 14 January 2021
Line 6:		Line 6:
	'''1. What is the name and the urban context (e.g. city/district) of the intervention? Please also indicate the geographical scale of the intervention (e.g. neighborhood, district, small/medium/ capital city, metropolitan area ...). [Example: “Brixton Energy in Brixton, London (neighborhood in capital city)”]'''		'''1. What is the name and the urban context (e.g. city/district) of the intervention? Please also indicate the geographical scale of the intervention (e.g. neighborhood, district, small/medium/ capital city, metropolitan area ...). [Example: “Brixton Energy in Brixton, London (neighborhood in capital city)”]'''

	This intervention focuses on the work of Ekostaden Augustenborg, a holistic neighbourhood development programme based in ~~one neighbourhood/~~district in Malmö, a Swedish city with over 300.000 inhabitants.		This intervention focuses on the work of Ekostaden Augustenborg, a holistic neighbourhood development programme based in the Augustenborg district in Malmö, a Swedish city with over 300.000 inhabitants.

	This project initially focused on sustainable neighbourhood development with the goals of constructing an effective drainage system, energy retrofitting buildings, and supporting biodiversity efforts. Additional social, ecological, and economical topics were adopted over the course of the project.		This project initially focused on sustainable neighbourhood development with the goals of constructing an effective drainage system, energy retrofitting buildings, and supporting biodiversity efforts. Additional social, ecological, and economical topics were adopted over the course of the project.
Line 51:		Line 51:
	*World Habitat Awards (2014): Eco-city Augustenborg, Sweden, Winner, World Habitat Award.		*World Habitat Awards (2014): Eco-city Augustenborg, Sweden, Winner, World Habitat Award.
	https://www.world-habitat.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Report-Eco-city-Augustenborg-peer-exchange-5MB1.pdf		https://www.world-habitat.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Report-Eco-city-Augustenborg-peer-exchange-5MB1.pdf


	== b) Additional basic characteristics, links to earlier UrbanA work ==		== b) Additional basic characteristics, links to earlier UrbanA work ==

Sophia McRae at 12:22, 6 January 2021

2021-01-06T12:22:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:22, 6 January 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This intervention has been translated into a brief governance scenario. Take a look at [[Overcoming ~~compartmentalization~~ in ~~urban regeneration projects for inclusive sustainability and resilience~~]]		This intervention has been translated into a brief governance scenario. Take a look at [[Overcoming Silos in Urban Regeneration Projects: Holistic Neighbourhood Design]]

	== a) Basic characteristics and ambitions of the intervention ==		== a) Basic characteristics and ambitions of the intervention ==

Jakob Kramer at 15:25, 9 December 2020

2020-12-09T15:25:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:25, 9 December 2020
Line 449:		Line 449:
	'''29. Based on your answers to question 24, how has overcoming obstacles (reportedly) contributed to the learning process?'''		'''29. Based on your answers to question 24, how has overcoming obstacles (reportedly) contributed to the learning process?'''

	The implementation process changed over the course of the project. As mentioned, the greatest challenge of the development project was maintaining continuity and keeping residents involved. As central staff (along with their priorities) changed, the project lost credibility and support. The project then had to find new ways of doing things, such as giving residents more decision-making power. Project leaders then had to accept that things will not always go the way they planned, but the new ways can be interesting and much more diverse as a result.		The implementation process changed over the course of the project. As mentioned, the greatest challenge of the development project was maintaining continuity and keeping residents involved. As central staff (along with their priorities) changed, the project lost credibility and support. The project then had to find new ways of doing things, such as giving residents more decision-making power and making them responsible for certain parts of the project. Project leaders then had to accept that things will not always go the way they planned, but the new ways can be interesting and much more diverse as a result.

	'''30. Please list any tools that enabled the learning process (e.g. various Knowledge Brokerage Activities from pg. 24 of FOODLINK’s Deliverable 7.1 - linked in footnote)<ref>http://www.foodlinkscommunity.net/fileadmin/documents_organicresearch/foodlinks/publications/karner-etal-d-7-1.pdf		'''30. Please list any tools that enabled the learning process (e.g. various Knowledge Brokerage Activities from pg. 24 of FOODLINK’s Deliverable 7.1 - linked in footnote)<ref>http://www.foodlinkscommunity.net/fileadmin/documents_organicresearch/foodlinks/publications/karner-etal-d-7-1.pdf

Sophia McRae at 17:11, 30 November 2020

2020-11-30T17:11:47Z

Show changes