Collaborating Across Institutional Boundaries: Co-Creating Sustainable Neighborhoods - Revision history

Sophia Silverton at 17:09, 18 February 2021

2021-02-18T17:09:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, 18 February 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[File:Vauban Freiburg picture.jpg \|500px]]		[[File:Vauban Freiburg picture.jpg \|500px]]


	'''Imagine a green and pedestrianized city district where residents have participated in creating affordable and sustainable housing.'''		'''Imagine a green and pedestrianized city district where residents have participated in creating affordable and sustainable housing.'''
Line 13:		Line 14:
	'''Which problems could arise for such a project?'''		'''Which problems could arise for such a project?'''

	Undoubtedly, such innovative collaboration may not work smoothly right out of the gate, and some obstacles could be encountered on the way. For example, bureaucratic frameworks usually used by municipalities in urban development projects may not be adapted for such co-creation projects. Eventually, it could constrain ~~citizen~~ participation who may feel unjustly treated or disregarded by the municipality [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg#23. What obstacles to implementing the intervention (both generally, and in this particular context) have been identified, relating to:\|(Q.23)]]. Dissensus may also arise between grassroot project proponents that have contrasting visions about the district development (e.g. more libertarian or more institutionalized ambitions).		Undoubtedly, such innovative collaboration may not work smoothly right out of the gate, and some obstacles could be encountered on the way. For example, bureaucratic frameworks usually used by municipalities in urban development projects may not be adapted for such co-creation projects. Eventually, it could constrain citizens' participation, who may then feel unjustly treated or disregarded by the municipality [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg#23. What obstacles to implementing the intervention (both generally, and in this particular context) have been identified, relating to:\|(Q.23)]]. Dissensus may also arise between grassroot project proponents that have contrasting visions about the district development (e.g. more libertarian or more institutionalized ambitions).

	'''How can we deal with these obstacles?'''		'''How can we deal with these obstacles?'''

Sophia McRae at 11:22, 17 February 2021

2021-02-17T11:22:35Z

Sophia McRae at 12:03, 6 January 2021

2021-01-06T12:03:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 6 January 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This scenario has been developed on the basis of a [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg\|real-world case]].		This scenario has been developed on the basis of a [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg\|real world case]].

	[[File:Vauban Freiburg picture.jpg \|500px]]		[[File:Vauban Freiburg picture.jpg \|500px]]
Line 27:		Line 27:

	This scenario relates to some '''enabling governance arrangements''':		This scenario relates to some '''enabling governance arrangements''':
	*[[A) Create a comprehensive vision of change]]: Vauban’s prospective residents as well as project proponents developed a shared vision on how to live in a more sustainable way i.e. parking free areas, sustainable mobility, affordable and inclusive housing etc.		*[[1) Create a comprehensive vision of change\|Create a comprehensive vision of change]]: Vauban’s prospective residents as well as project proponents developed a shared vision on how to live in a more sustainable way i.e. parking free areas, sustainable mobility, affordable and inclusive housing etc.
	*[[C) Build bridges between separate stakeholder groups]]: The “Vauban city planning council” was a consultative committee consisting of municipal actors, local parliamentarians and citizens. It can be considered as an intermediary as it was a place for discussion and mediation between stakeholders.		*[[3) Build bridges between separate stakeholder groups\|Build bridges between separate stakeholder groups]]: The “Vauban city planning council” was a consultative committee consisting of municipal actors, local parliamentarians and citizens. It can be considered as an intermediary as it was a place for discussion and mediation between stakeholders.
	*[[D) Commit to a meaningful participation process]]: The citizen-led Vauban Forum was invited to participate in the “Vauban city planning council” (a consultative committee within the city council) which indicates that the municipality recognizes citizens as legitimate partners in the project development.		*[[4) Commit to a meaningful participation process\|Commit to a meaningful participation process]]: The citizen-led Vauban Forum was invited to participate in the “Vauban city planning council” (a consultative committee within the city council) which indicates that the municipality recognizes citizens as legitimate partners in the project development.
	*[[E) Tap into existing community networks]]: Housing Cooperative Networks in Germany inspired to some extent project proponents. Specifically, they benefited from the expertise of the cooperative confederation regarding economy, law and tax policy.		*[[5) Tap into existing community networks\|Tap into existing community networks]]: Housing Cooperative Networks in Germany inspired to some extent project proponents. Specifically, they benefited from the expertise of the cooperative confederation regarding economy, law and tax policy.

	This scenario fits under the '''approaches''':		This scenario fits under the '''approaches''':

Sophia McRae at 13:43, 5 January 2021

2021-01-05T13:43:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:43, 5 January 2021
Line 6:		Line 6:

	'''How can we create this reality?'''		'''How can we create this reality?'''

	This intervention may be initiated by citizens wishing to live in more sustainable ways. With a common understanding of what a sustainable neighbourhood could look like (i.e. affordable and low-energy housing, green areas, and gentle mobility), citizens from diverse backgrounds could engage in formal urban development processes to bring their vision to life. More specifically, these plans should converge with the municipality’s interest in establishing a new district, in so doing experimenting with innovative measures such as participatory planning and the integration of citizens’ housing cooperatives (Q.10). Success would depend on the collaboration between citizen organizations, which would be progressively professionalized, and the municipality working in partnership to implement the project (Q.13). Indeed, a real co-creation process can only result from the well-defined and (relatively) horizontal distribution of responsibilities between each group (Q.15).		This intervention may be initiated by citizens wishing to live in more sustainable ways. With a common understanding of what a sustainable neighbourhood could look like (i.e. affordable and low-energy housing, green areas, and gentle mobility), citizens from diverse backgrounds could engage in formal urban development processes to bring their vision to life. More specifically, these plans should converge with the municipality’s interest in establishing a new district, in so doing experimenting with innovative measures such as participatory planning and the integration of citizens’ housing cooperatives (Q.10). Success would depend on the collaboration between citizen organizations, which would be progressively professionalized, and the municipality working in partnership to implement the project (Q.13). Indeed, a real co-creation process can only result from the well-defined and (relatively) horizontal distribution of responsibilities between each group (Q.15).

Line 11:		Line 12:

	'''Which problems could arise for such a project?'''		'''Which problems could arise for such a project?'''

	Undoubtedly, such innovative collaboration may not work smoothly right out of the gate, and some obstacles could be encountered on the way. For example, bureaucratic frameworks usually used by municipalities in urban development projects may not be adapted for such co-creation projects. Eventually, it could constrain citizen participation who may feel unjustly treated or disregarded by the municipality (Q.23). Dissensus may also arise between grassroot project proponents that have contrasting visions about the district development (e.g. more libertarian or more institutionalized ambitions).		Undoubtedly, such innovative collaboration may not work smoothly right out of the gate, and some obstacles could be encountered on the way. For example, bureaucratic frameworks usually used by municipalities in urban development projects may not be adapted for such co-creation projects. Eventually, it could constrain citizen participation who may feel unjustly treated or disregarded by the municipality (Q.23). Dissensus may also arise between grassroot project proponents that have contrasting visions about the district development (e.g. more libertarian or more institutionalized ambitions).

	'''How can we deal with these obstacles?'''		'''How can we deal with these obstacles?'''

	Since such obstacles are often related to misunderstandings or a lack of communication, most important would be to openly discuss any frustrations (e.g. about procedures and visions) and appreciating the mutual expectations of the different citizen groups and the municipality. A mediator or the creation of a special council with representatives from both groups could facilitate dialogue and be of great support (Q.24). As roles and expectations are necessarily adjusted and transparency and mutual trust between actors is reestablished (Q.29), the project could be successfully implemented.		Since such obstacles are often related to misunderstandings or a lack of communication, most important would be to openly discuss any frustrations (e.g. about procedures and visions) and appreciating the mutual expectations of the different citizen groups and the municipality. A mediator or the creation of a special council with representatives from both groups could facilitate dialogue and be of great support (Q.24). As roles and expectations are necessarily adjusted and transparency and mutual trust between actors is reestablished (Q.29), the project could be successfully implemented.
	This intervention on governance arrangements for urban development projects aims at being inspirational for citizens and urban policy makers (Q.31). Eventually, key governance arrangements featured in this scenario may be replicated elsewhere, including in different sectors at the municipal level or/and to other urban contexts (Q.33).		This intervention on governance arrangements for urban development projects aims at being inspirational for citizens and urban policy makers (Q.31). Eventually, key governance arrangements featured in this scenario may be replicated elsewhere, including in different sectors at the municipal level or/and to other urban contexts (Q.33).

Romane Joly at 12:58, 4 January 2021

2021-01-04T12:58:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:58, 4 January 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This scenario has been developed on the basis of a [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg\|real-world case]].		This scenario has been developed on the basis of a [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg\|real-world case]].

			[[File:Vauban Freiburg picture.jpg \|500px]]

	'''Imagine a green and pedestrianized city district where residents have participated in creating affordable and sustainable housing (Q.2 & 3).'''		'''Imagine a green and pedestrianized city district where residents have participated in creating affordable and sustainable housing (Q.2 & 3).'''

Sophia McRae at 13:20, 23 December 2020

2020-12-23T13:20:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:20, 23 December 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
			This scenario has been developed on the basis of a [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg\|real-world case]].

	'''Imagine a green and pedestrianized city district where residents have participated in creating affordable and sustainable housing (Q.2 & 3).'''		'''Imagine a green and pedestrianized city district where residents have participated in creating affordable and sustainable housing (Q.2 & 3).'''

Sophia McRae: Sophia McRae moved page Envisioning and co-creating sustainable urban neighborhoods by reaching across institutional boundaries to Collaborating Across Institutional Boundaries: Co-Creating Sustainable Neighborhoods

2020-12-23T13:02:05Z

Sophia McRae moved page Envisioning and co-creating sustainable urban neighborhoods by reaching across institutional boundaries to Collaborating Across Institutional Boundaries: Co-Creating Sustainable Neighborhoods

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:02, 23 December 2020
(No difference)

Sophia McRae at 13:39, 13 December 2020

2020-12-13T13:39:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 13 December 2020
Line 20:		Line 20:

	This scenario relates to some '''enabling governance arrangements''':		This scenario relates to some '''enabling governance arrangements''':
	[[A) Create a comprehensive vision of change]]: Vauban’s prospective residents as well as project proponents developed a shared vision on how to live in a more sustainable way i.e. parking free areas, sustainable mobility, affordable and inclusive housing etc.		*[[A) Create a comprehensive vision of change]]: Vauban’s prospective residents as well as project proponents developed a shared vision on how to live in a more sustainable way i.e. parking free areas, sustainable mobility, affordable and inclusive housing etc.
	[[C) Build bridges between separate stakeholder groups]]: The “Vauban city planning council” was a consultative committee consisting of municipal actors, local parliamentarians and citizens. It can be considered as an intermediary as it was a place for discussion and mediation between stakeholders.		*[[C) Build bridges between separate stakeholder groups]]: The “Vauban city planning council” was a consultative committee consisting of municipal actors, local parliamentarians and citizens. It can be considered as an intermediary as it was a place for discussion and mediation between stakeholders.
	[[D) Commit to a meaningful participation process]]: The citizen-led Vauban Forum was invited to participate in the “Vauban city planning council” (a consultative committee within the city council) which indicates that the municipality recognizes citizens as legitimate partners in the project development.		*[[D) Commit to a meaningful participation process]]: The citizen-led Vauban Forum was invited to participate in the “Vauban city planning council” (a consultative committee within the city council) which indicates that the municipality recognizes citizens as legitimate partners in the project development.
	[[E) Tap into existing community networks]]: Housing Cooperative Networks in Germany inspired to some extent project proponents. Specifically, they benefited from the expertise of the cooperative confederation regarding economy, law and tax policy.		*[[E) Tap into existing community networks]]: Housing Cooperative Networks in Germany inspired to some extent project proponents. Specifically, they benefited from the expertise of the cooperative confederation regarding economy, law and tax policy.

	This scenario fits under the '''approaches''':		This scenario fits under the '''approaches''':

Sophia McRae at 13:39, 13 December 2020

2020-12-13T13:39:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 13 December 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Imagine a green and pedestrianized city district where residents have participated in creating affordable and sustainable housing.'''		'''Imagine a green and pedestrianized city district where residents have participated in creating affordable and sustainable housing (Q.2 & 3).'''

	This intervention may be initiated by citizens wishing to live in more sustainable ways.With a common understanding ~~and vision~~ of what a sustainable neighbourhood ~~is meant to be,~~ i.e. affordable and low-energy housing, green areas ~~as well as~~ gentle mobility, citizens from diverse backgrounds could ~~have identified their participation~~ in formal urban development ~~as the only way for this scenario~~ to ~~emerge~~. ~~But can this be done? Specifically~~, ~~converging interests~~ with the ~~municipality and its intentions to establish~~ a new district ~~while~~ experimenting with innovative measures ~~like~~ participatory planning and the ~~creation~~ of citizens’ housing cooperatives~~, may be crucial~~. ~~Citizen~~ organizations, ~~being~~ progressively professionalized, and the municipality ~~could work~~ in partnership to implement the project ~~whose success may depend on the good collaboration between them~~. Indeed, a real co-creation process can only result from the well-defined and (relatively) horizontal distribution of responsibilities between each group.		'''How can we create this reality?'''
			This intervention may be initiated by citizens wishing to live in more sustainable ways. With a common understanding of what a sustainable neighbourhood could look like (i.e. affordable and low-energy housing, green areas, and gentle mobility), citizens from diverse backgrounds could engage in formal urban development processes to bring their vision to life. More specifically, these plans should converge with the municipality’s interest in establishing a new district, in so doing experimenting with innovative measures such as participatory planning and the integration of citizens’ housing cooperatives (Q.10). Success would depend on the collaboration between citizen organizations, which would be progressively professionalized, and the municipality working in partnership to implement the project (Q.13). Indeed, a real co-creation process can only result from the well-defined and (relatively) horizontal distribution of responsibilities between each group (Q.15).

	Building on the experiences of previous community projects could facilitate citizens’ participation. Indeed, such background may provide legitimacy to citizen-led interventions ~~as well as enhance~~ trust among municipal actors in the capacity of citizen groups to successfully implement projects. Additionally, ~~benefiting from~~ organizational and human resources from other community networks may be of great support for the project’s proponents.		Building on the experiences of previous community projects could facilitate citizens’ participation. Indeed, such background may provide legitimacy to citizen-led interventions and build trust among municipal actors in the capacity of citizen groups to successfully implement projects (Q.20). Additionally, the organizational and human resources from other community networks may be of great support for the project’s proponents (Q.27).

	Undoubtedly, such innovative collaboration ~~cannot~~ work smoothly right out of the gate, some obstacles ~~may~~ be encountered on the way. For example, bureaucratic frameworks usually used by municipalities in urban development projects may not be adapted for such co-creation projects. Eventually, it could constrain citizen participation who may ~~then~~ feel unjustly treated ~~and~~ disregarded by the municipality. Dissensus may also arise between grassroot project proponents ~~having~~ contrasting visions about the district development (e.g. more libertarian or more institutionalized ambitions).		'''Which problems could arise for such a project?'''
			Undoubtedly, such innovative collaboration may not work smoothly right out of the gate, and some obstacles could be encountered on the way. For example, bureaucratic frameworks usually used by municipalities in urban development projects may not be adapted for such co-creation projects. Eventually, it could constrain citizen participation who may feel unjustly treated or disregarded by the municipality (Q.23). Dissensus may also arise between grassroot project proponents that have contrasting visions about the district development (e.g. more libertarian or more institutionalized ambitions).

	Since such obstacles are ~~mostly~~ related to a lack of communication ~~and misunderstandings~~, most important ~~may~~ be to ~~express~~ any ~~discontents or~~ frustrations (e.g. about procedures and visions) and ~~discuss these issues. Handy solutions could be found in~~ appreciating the mutual ~~wishes and~~ expectations of the different citizen groups and the municipality. A mediator ~~reestablishing~~ the dialogue ~~between these actors may~~ be of great support. As roles and expectations ~~would be~~ adjusted ~~as well as~~ transparency and mutual trust between actors ~~granted~~, the project could be successfully implemented.		'''How can we deal with these obstacles?'''
			Since such obstacles are often related to misunderstandings or a lack of communication, most important would be to openly discuss any frustrations (e.g. about procedures and visions) and appreciating the mutual expectations of the different citizen groups and the municipality. A mediator or the creation of a special council with representatives from both groups could facilitate dialogue and be of great support (Q.24). As roles and expectations are necessarily adjusted and transparency and mutual trust between actors is reestablished (Q.29), the project could be successfully implemented.
			This intervention on governance arrangements for urban development projects aims at being inspirational for citizens and urban policy makers (Q.31). Eventually, key governance arrangements featured in this scenario may be replicated elsewhere, including in different sectors at the municipal level or/and to other urban contexts (Q.33).

	~~This intervention on governance arrangements for urban development projects aims at being inspirational for citizens and urban policy makers. Eventually, key governance arrangements featured in~~ this ~~scenario may~~ be ~~replicated elsewhere, including~~ in ~~different sectors at the municipal level or/and~~ to ~~other urban contexts.~~		'''How could this reality be created in your city? What obstacles would have to be overcome?'''

	==Do you want to learn more about this scenario?==		==Do you want to learn more about this scenario?==

	~~Take a look at~~ the ~~detailed~~ [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg]] that ~~has~~ inspired ~~this scenario~~.		This scenario was based on the development of the [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg\|Vauban Eco-District]] in Freiburg, Germany, where the municipality created a special representative council (Vauban City Planning Council) and collaborated with citizen’s groups (namely the Forum Vauban and co-housing initiatives) to co-create the sustainable neighborhood project. If you are interested in how obstacles have been overcome in this case, see Q24. Check out their website to learn more: http://quartiersarbeit-vauban.de/das-quartier-vauban/

			This scenario relates to some '''enabling governance arrangements''':
			[[A) Create a comprehensive vision of change]]: Vauban’s prospective residents as well as project proponents developed a shared vision on how to live in a more sustainable way i.e. parking free areas, sustainable mobility, affordable and inclusive housing etc.
			[[C) Build bridges between separate stakeholder groups]]: The “Vauban city planning council” was a consultative committee consisting of municipal actors, local parliamentarians and citizens. It can be considered as an intermediary as it was a place for discussion and mediation between stakeholders.
			[[D) Commit to a meaningful participation process]]: The citizen-led Vauban Forum was invited to participate in the “Vauban city planning council” (a consultative committee within the city council) which indicates that the municipality recognizes citizens as legitimate partners in the project development.
			[[E) Tap into existing community networks]]: Housing Cooperative Networks in Germany inspired to some extent project proponents. Specifically, they benefited from the expertise of the cooperative confederation regarding economy, law and tax policy.

	This scenario fits under the '''approaches''':		This scenario fits under the '''approaches''':
	*[[Co-living, co-housing & intentional communities]]~~. The approach refers to a variety of approaches and movements that aim to provide affordable, ecological or community housing in both urban and rural contexts.~~		*[[Co-living, co-housing & intentional communities]]
	*[[Governance and participation processes]]. This approach geared toward urban sustainability emphasise defining and addressing environmental problems as well as envisioning the future of cities, mainly based on the co-production of knowledge through innovative, diverse and strategic partnerships.		*[[Governance and participation processes]]
	*[[Sharing and cooperatives for urban commons]]. The approach refers to a paradigm shift away from individualistic and exclusivity practices, which are embedded in modern urbanism and urban lifestyles in regards to particular resources and services. Sharing is a central aspect of commoning practices, while commons governance often takes the form of cooperatives.		*[[Sharing and cooperatives for urban commons]]

	It addresses some '''drivers of injustice''':		It addresses some '''drivers of injustice''':
	*[[Uneven and exclusionary urban intensification and regeneration]]. This driver refers to the ways in which new urban developments might force trade-offs between the social and environmental goals of urban sustainability projects. It involves public efforts to improve a neighbourhood’s physical structure and boost its economy by attracting investment, usually in the sectors of real estate and tourism.		*[[Uneven and exclusionary urban intensification and regeneration]]
	*[[Exclusive access to the benefits of sustainability infrastructure]]. This driver refers to the ways in which territory, identity, education, knowledge, and information are used to draw lines, privileges, and hierarchies between social groups, and especially to how this leads to an uneven distribution of benefits from urban sustainability efforts.		*[[Exclusive access to the benefits of sustainability infrastructure]]
	*[[Limited citizen participation in urban planning]]~~. This driver refers~~ to the limited involvement and engagement of citizens and citizens’ initiatives in decision-making around the planning, design, implementation and/or evaluation of urban sustainability-oriented interventions.		*[[Limited citizen participation in urban planning]]

			What do you think about this scenario? Was it helpful to you? Do you find our approach problematic? Send us an email to [[User:Philipp Spaeth\|Philipp Spaeth]].

Romane Joly at 14:51, 18 August 2020

2020-08-18T14:51:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, 18 August 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Imagine a green and pedestrianized city district where residents have participated in creating affordable and sustainable housing.'''		'''Imagine a green and pedestrianized city district where residents have participated in creating affordable and sustainable housing.'''

	This intervention may be initiated by citizens wishing to live in more sustainable ways. With a ~~clear~~ vision of a sustainable neighbourhood, citizens could have identified their participation in formal urban development as the only way for this scenario to emerge. But can this be done? Specifically, converging interests with the municipality and its intentions to establish a new district while experimenting with innovative measures like participatory planning and the creation of citizens’ housing cooperatives, may be crucial. ~~Citizens~~ and the municipality could work in partnership to implement the project whose success may depend on the good collaboration between them. Indeed, a real co-creation process can only result from the well-defined and (relatively) horizontal distribution of responsibilities between each group.		This intervention may be initiated by citizens wishing to live in more sustainable ways.With a common understanding and vision of what a sustainable neighbourhood is meant to be, i.e. affordable and low-energy housing, green areas as well as gentle mobility, citizens from diverse backgrounds could have identified their participation in formal urban development as the only way for this scenario to emerge. But can this be done? Specifically, converging interests with the municipality and its intentions to establish a new district while experimenting with innovative measures like participatory planning and the creation of citizens’ housing cooperatives, may be crucial. Citizen organizations, being progressively professionalized, and the municipality could work in partnership to implement the project whose success may depend on the good collaboration between them. Indeed, a real co-creation process can only result from the well-defined and (relatively) horizontal distribution of responsibilities between each group.

	Building on the experiences of previous community projects could facilitate citizens’ participation. Indeed, such background may provide legitimacy to citizen-led interventions as well as enhance trust among municipal actors in the capacity of citizen groups to successfully implement projects. Additionally, benefiting from organizational and human resources from other community networks may be of great support for the project’s proponents.		Building on the experiences of previous community projects could facilitate citizens’ participation. Indeed, such background may provide legitimacy to citizen-led interventions as well as enhance trust among municipal actors in the capacity of citizen groups to successfully implement projects. Additionally, benefiting from organizational and human resources from other community networks may be of great support for the project’s proponents.

	Undoubtedly, such innovative collaboration cannot work smoothly right out of the gate, some obstacles may be encountered on the way. For example, bureaucratic frameworks usually used by municipalities in urban development projects may not be adapted for such co-creation projects. Eventually, it could constrain citizen participation who may then feel unjustly treated and disregarded by the municipality.		Undoubtedly, such innovative collaboration cannot work smoothly right out of the gate, some obstacles may be encountered on the way. For example, bureaucratic frameworks usually used by municipalities in urban development projects may not be adapted for such co-creation projects. Eventually, it could constrain citizen participation who may then feel unjustly treated and disregarded by the municipality. Dissensus may also arise between grassroot project proponents having contrasting visions about the district development (e.g. more libertarian or more institutionalized ambitions).

	Since such obstacles are mostly related to a lack of communication and misunderstandings, most important may be to express any discontents or frustrations (e.g. about procedures) and discuss these issues. Handy solutions could be found in appreciating the mutual wishes and expectations of ~~citizens~~ and the municipality. A mediator reestablishing the dialogue between these actors may be of great support. As roles and expectations would be adjusted as well as transparency and mutual trust between actors granted, the project could be successfully implemented.		Since such obstacles are mostly related to a lack of communication and misunderstandings, most important may be to express any discontents or frustrations (e.g. about procedures and visions) and discuss these issues. Handy solutions could be found in appreciating the mutual wishes and expectations of the different citizen groups and the municipality. A mediator reestablishing the dialogue between these actors may be of great support. As roles and expectations would be adjusted as well as transparency and mutual trust between actors granted, the project could be successfully implemented.

	This intervention on governance arrangements for urban development projects aims at being inspirational for citizens and urban policy makers. Eventually, key governance arrangements featured in this scenario may be replicated elsewhere, including in different sectors at the municipal level or/and to other urban contexts.		This intervention on governance arrangements for urban development projects aims at being inspirational for citizens and urban policy makers. Eventually, key governance arrangements featured in this scenario may be replicated elsewhere, including in different sectors at the municipal level or/and to other urban contexts.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:22, 17 February 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:
	[[File:Vauban Freiburg picture.jpg \|500px]]		[[File:Vauban Freiburg picture.jpg \|500px]]

	'''Imagine a green and pedestrianized city district where residents have participated in creating affordable and sustainable housing ~~(Q.2 & 3)~~.'''		'''Imagine a green and pedestrianized city district where residents have participated in creating affordable and sustainable housing.'''

	'''How can we create this reality?'''		'''How can we create this reality?'''

	This intervention may be initiated by citizens wishing to live in more sustainable ways. With a common understanding of what a sustainable neighbourhood could look like (i.e. affordable and low-energy housing, green areas, and gentle mobility), citizens from diverse backgrounds could engage in formal urban development processes to bring their vision to life. More specifically, these plans should converge with the municipality’s interest in establishing a new district, in so doing experimenting with innovative measures such as participatory planning and the integration of citizens’ housing cooperatives (Q.10). Success would depend on the collaboration between citizen organizations, which would be progressively professionalized, and the municipality working in partnership to implement the project (Q.13). Indeed, a real co-creation process can only result from the well-defined and (relatively) horizontal distribution of responsibilities between each group (Q.15).		This intervention may be initiated by citizens wishing to live in more sustainable ways. With a common understanding of what a sustainable neighbourhood could look like (i.e. affordable and low-energy housing, green areas, and gentle mobility), citizens from diverse backgrounds could engage in formal urban development processes to bring their vision to life. More specifically, these plans should converge with the municipality’s interest in establishing a new district, in so doing experimenting with innovative measures such as participatory planning and the integration of citizens’ housing cooperatives [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg#10. Who initiated the intervention?\|(Q.10)]]. Success would depend on the collaboration between citizen organizations, which would be progressively professionalized, and the municipality working in partnership to implement the project [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg#13. Which particular interactions among various stakeholders (stakeholder configurations) were crucial in enabling the intervention to emerge successfully? This could include direct or indirect impacts on interventions.\|(Q.13)]]. Indeed, a real co-creation process can only result from the well-defined and (relatively) horizontal distribution of responsibilities between each group [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg#15. How are responsibilities and/or decision-making power distributed among actors?\|(Q.15)]].

	Building on the experiences of previous community projects could facilitate citizens’ participation. Indeed, such background may provide legitimacy to citizen-led interventions and build trust among municipal actors in the capacity of citizen groups to successfully implement projects (Q.20). Additionally, the organizational and human resources from other community networks may be of great support for the project’s proponents (Q.27).		Building on the experiences of previous community projects could facilitate citizens’ participation. Indeed, such background may provide legitimacy to citizen-led interventions and build trust among municipal actors in the capacity of citizen groups to successfully implement projects [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg#20. According to project material/and or interviews, in what ways have particularities of (local) political culture influenced the character and success of the intervention? (i.e. trust in political institutions, citizens’ will to interact with policy makers and vice versa, traditions of cooperation etc.)\|(Q.20)]]. Additionally, the organizational and human resources from other community networks may be of great support for the project’s proponents [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg#27. Has any acquired knowledge (e.g. technical knowledge, awareness of local political procedures etc.) been reported as particularly helpful to this intervention?\|(Q.27)]].

	'''Which problems could arise for such a project?'''		'''Which problems could arise for such a project?'''

	Undoubtedly, such innovative collaboration may not work smoothly right out of the gate, and some obstacles could be encountered on the way. For example, bureaucratic frameworks usually used by municipalities in urban development projects may not be adapted for such co-creation projects. Eventually, it could constrain citizen participation who may feel unjustly treated or disregarded by the municipality (Q.23). Dissensus may also arise between grassroot project proponents that have contrasting visions about the district development (e.g. more libertarian or more institutionalized ambitions).		Undoubtedly, such innovative collaboration may not work smoothly right out of the gate, and some obstacles could be encountered on the way. For example, bureaucratic frameworks usually used by municipalities in urban development projects may not be adapted for such co-creation projects. Eventually, it could constrain citizen participation who may feel unjustly treated or disregarded by the municipality [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg#23. What obstacles to implementing the intervention (both generally, and in this particular context) have been identified, relating to:\|(Q.23)]]. Dissensus may also arise between grassroot project proponents that have contrasting visions about the district development (e.g. more libertarian or more institutionalized ambitions).

	'''How can we deal with these obstacles?'''		'''How can we deal with these obstacles?'''

	Since such obstacles are often related to misunderstandings or a lack of communication, most important would be to openly discuss any frustrations (e.g. about procedures and visions) and appreciating the mutual expectations of the different citizen groups and the municipality. A mediator or the creation of a special council with representatives from both groups could facilitate dialogue and be of great support (Q.24). As roles and expectations are necessarily adjusted and transparency and mutual trust between actors is reestablished (Q.29), the project could be successfully implemented.		Since such obstacles are often related to misunderstandings or a lack of communication, most important would be to openly discuss any frustrations (e.g. about procedures and visions) and appreciating the mutual expectations of the different citizen groups and the municipality. A mediator or the creation of a special council with representatives from both groups could facilitate dialogue and be of great support [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg#24. What has been done by each central actor group to overcome which particular obstacles in the way of successfully implementing the intervention? (this may include institutional Work - maintaining, disrupting, and creating new rules, applying to both formal laws/regulations and informal norms and expectations.)\|(Q.24)]]. As roles and expectations are necessarily adjusted and transparency and mutual trust between actors is reestablished [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg#29. Based on your answers to question 24, how has overcoming obstacles (reportedly) contributed to the learning process?\|(Q.29)]], the project could be successfully implemented.
	This intervention on governance arrangements for urban development projects aims at being inspirational for citizens and urban policy makers (Q.31). Eventually, key governance arrangements featured in this scenario may be replicated elsewhere, including in different sectors at the municipal level or/and to other urban contexts (Q.33).		This intervention on governance arrangements for urban development projects aims at being inspirational for citizens and urban policy makers [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg#31. Suggestions regarding transferability.\|(Q.31)]]. Eventually, key governance arrangements featured in this scenario may be replicated elsewhere, including in different sectors at the municipal level or/and to other urban contexts [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg#33. Have any signs of collaboration, support, or inspiration already been reported between actors involved in this intervention and others that follow its example? (e.g. in “follower cities”?)\|(Q.33)]].

	'''How could this reality be created in your city? What obstacles would have to be overcome?'''		'''How could this reality be created in your city? What obstacles would have to be overcome?'''
Line 24:		Line 24:
	==Do you want to learn more about this scenario?==		==Do you want to learn more about this scenario?==

	This scenario was based on the development of the [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg\|Vauban Eco-District]] in Freiburg, Germany, where the municipality created a special representative council (Vauban City Planning Council) and collaborated with citizen’s groups (namely the Forum Vauban and co-housing initiatives) to co-create the sustainable neighborhood project. If you are interested in how obstacles have been overcome in this case, see Q24. Check out their website to learn more: http://quartiersarbeit-vauban.de/das-quartier-vauban/		This scenario was based on the development of the [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg\|Vauban Eco-District]] in Freiburg, Germany, where the municipality created a special representative council (Vauban City Planning Council) and collaborated with citizen’s groups (namely the Forum Vauban and co-housing initiatives) to co-create the sustainable neighborhood project. If you are interested in how obstacles have been overcome in this case, [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg#24. What has been done by each central actor group to overcome which particular obstacles in the way of successfully implementing the intervention? (this may include institutional Work - maintaining, disrupting, and creating new rules, applying to both formal laws/regulations and informal norms and expectations.)\|see Q24]]. Check out their website to learn more: http://quartiersarbeit-vauban.de/das-quartier-vauban/

	This scenario relates to some '''enabling governance arrangements''':		This scenario relates to some '''enabling governance arrangements''':