Build bridges between separate stakeholder groups - Revision history

Nadia Ali at 10:40, 15 March 2021

2021-03-15T10:40:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:40, 15 March 2021
Line 28:		Line 28:
	''' ''Bürger Energie Berlin'', Berlin'''		''' ''Bürger Energie Berlin'', Berlin'''

	There have been changes in terms of changing how the energy system can be imagined, who owns it and who participates in it. Political documents for example the coalition agreement in Berlin ~~have some changes,~~ particular attention ~~has been given~~ to citizens’ participation in the energy sector. Now there is also legislation for tenants’ energy self-consumption models which the citizen energy movement has contributed to (Interview with a BEB representative on Sep. 9,2020).		There have been changes in terms of changing how the energy system can be imagined, who owns it and who participates in it. Political documents for example the coalition agreement in Berlin gives particular attention to citizens’ participation in the energy sector. Now there is also legislation for tenants’ energy self-consumption models which the citizen energy movement has contributed to (Interview with a BEB representative on Sep. 9,2020).

	Learn more about this intervention:		Learn more about this intervention:

Sophia McRae at 10:31, 5 March 2021

2021-03-05T10:31:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:31, 5 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<embedvideo service="youtube" alignment="right" dimensions="480">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Br1bc_5uvlw</embedvideo>

	[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|400x400x\|thumb\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]		[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|400x400x\|thumb\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]

Sophia McRae at 10:21, 4 March 2021

2021-03-04T10:21:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:21, 4 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|400x400x\|thumb\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]		[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|400x400x\|thumb\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]

	~~Examples from real world governance interventions:~~

	*[[Bottom-up resistance against gentrification in Rome]]
	*[[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg]]
	*[[Citizens share in Berlin Energy Grid for sustainable energy]]
	*[[Inner-city community energy in London]]
	*[[Community led affordable housing in Brussels]]
	*[[Dealing flexibly with and learning from resistance in Barcelona]]
	*[[Holistic neighbourhood development Augustenborg]]

	== General ambition ==		== General ambition ==
Line 20:		Line 10:
	''' ''Anti-gentrification resistance'', Rome '''		''' ''Anti-gentrification resistance'', Rome '''

	The role of anti-eviction platforms was crucial as they contributed to voice the claim and to represent the interests of evicted/targeted citizens. The anti-eviction platforms liaised between them and the municipality as well as the Housing Authority. However, they did not have a formal role in influencing policy making. (Q.13).		The role of anti-eviction platforms was crucial as they contributed to voice the claim and to represent the interests of evicted/targeted citizens. The anti-eviction platforms liaised between them and the municipality as well as the Housing Authority. However, they did not have a formal role in influencing policy making [[Bottom-up resistance against gentrification in Rome#13. Which particular interactions among various stakeholders (stakeholder configurations) were crucial in enabling the intervention to emerge successfully? This could include direct or indirect impacts on interventions.\|(Q13)]].

	Learn more about this intervention:		Learn more about this intervention:
Line 28:		Line 18:
	''' ''Vauban neighborhood'', Freiburg'''		''' ''Vauban neighborhood'', Freiburg'''

	The “Vauban city planning council” was a consultative committee consisting of municipal actors, local parliamentarians and citizens. It can be considered as an intermediary as it was a place for discussion and mediation between stakeholders (~~Q.15~~).		The “Vauban city planning council” was a consultative committee consisting of municipal actors, local parliamentarians and citizens. It can be considered as an intermediary as it was a place for discussion and mediation between stakeholders [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg#15. How are responsibilities and/or decision-making power distributed among actors?\|(Q15)]].

	Learn more about this intervention:		Learn more about this intervention:
Line 44:		Line 34:
	''' ''Repowering'', London'''		''' ''Repowering'', London'''

	The local government, Lambeth Council, which had a small group running a Low Carbon Zone served as an intermediary organization in the beginning which helped the team organize themselves and contact other relevant groups. The enabling configuration is the connectedness of this Council to various groups in the area. However, this group was small and had minimal capacity (Q.13).		The local government, Lambeth Council, which had a small group running a Low Carbon Zone served as an intermediary organization in the beginning which helped the team organize themselves and contact other relevant groups. The enabling configuration is the connectedness of this Council to various groups in the area. However, this group was small and had minimal capacity [[Inner-city community energy in London#13. Which particular interactions among various stakeholders (stakeholder configurations) were crucial in enabling the intervention to emerge successfully? This could include direct or indirect impacts on interventions.\|(Q13)]].

	Learn more about this intervention:		Learn more about this intervention:
Line 52:		Line 42:
	''' ''Community Land Trust Models'', Brussels'''		''' ''Community Land Trust Models'', Brussels'''

	The Community Land Trust in Brussels is a social real estate developer that builds affordable housing projects on collectively-owned land in Brussels for people with limited means. Collaboration between separate stakeholder groups is integral to the project as its managing board consists of civil society/housing organisations, private firms, social enterprises and the local government (Q5).		The Community Land Trust in Brussels is a social real estate developer that builds affordable housing projects on collectively-owned land in Brussels for people with limited means. Collaboration between separate stakeholder groups is integral to the project as its managing board consists of civil society/housing organisations, private firms, social enterprises and the local government [[Community led affordable housing in Brussels#5. By what governance mode is the intervention characterized primarily? (see Appendix 1: Three modes of governance)\|(Q5)]].

	Learn more about this intervention:		Learn more about this intervention:
Line 60:		Line 50:
	''' ''Superblocks'', Barcelona'''		''' ''Superblocks'', Barcelona'''

	In several neighbourhoods, multi-stakeholder decision making processes have been formalized in local, regular working groups that are steering the design for their Superblocks. This was a result of the lack of participation processes in Poblenou and the municipality retroactively realizing that individual Superblocks have to be adapted to local particularities. The working groups also serve promotional purposes e.g, presenting the Municipal Action Plan to residents and engaging citizens, local associations, and local economy. They also try to find agreements between different voices and stakeholder interests. (Q13)		In several neighbourhoods, multi-stakeholder decision making processes have been formalized in local, regular working groups that are steering the design for their Superblocks. This was a result of the lack of participation processes in Poblenou and the municipality retroactively realizing that individual Superblocks have to be adapted to local particularities. The working groups also serve promotional purposes e.g, presenting the Municipal Action Plan to residents and engaging citizens, local associations, and local economy. They also try to find agreements between different voices and stakeholder interests [[Dealing flexibly with and learning from resistance in Barcelona#13. Which particular interactions among various stakeholders (stakeholder configurations) were crucial in enabling the intervention to emerge successfully? This could include direct or indirect impacts on interventions.\|(Q13)]].

	Learn more about this intervention:		Learn more about this intervention:
Line 85:		Line 75:
	''' ''Holistic Neighborhood Development'', Augustenborg'''		''' ''Holistic Neighborhood Development'', Augustenborg'''

	In Malmö, each department has its own unit designed for community engagement (e.g the Highway and Parks department, the Culture department…). On a city level, these units can be brought together through an intermediary organization connecting neighbours, the city, housing companies, local companies. These departments could then become the core of long-term structured development processes, acting as an institutionalized intermediary and memory while transferring knowledge in and between cities (Q31)		In Malmö, each department has its own unit designed for community engagement (e.g the Highway and Parks department, the Culture department…). On a city level, these units can be brought together through an intermediary organization connecting neighbours, the city, housing companies, local companies. These departments could then become the core of long-term structured development processes, acting as an institutionalized intermediary and memory while transferring knowledge in and between cities [[Holistic neighbourhood development Augustenborg#31. Suggestions regarding transferability.\|(Q31)]].

	Learn more about this intervention:		Learn more about this intervention:
Line 93:		Line 83:
	''' ''Vauban neighborhood'', Freiburg'''		''' ''Vauban neighborhood'', Freiburg'''

	The collaboration between citizens and the municipality was not always easy because each group had to adapt to the institutional logic of the others. For instance, when the GRAG invited a representative of Forum Vauban to take over a permanent seat in a consulting role, “Forum Vauban welcomed this decision of the city as a step towards them. Nevertheless they were not always satisfied, because the citizens were expected to adapt to the logic of urban planning which already existed in the city bureaucracy (Q23).		The collaboration between citizens and the municipality was not always easy because each group had to adapt to the institutional logic of the others. For instance, when the GRAG invited a representative of Forum Vauban to take over a permanent seat in a consulting role, “Forum Vauban welcomed this decision of the city as a step towards them. Nevertheless they were not always satisfied, because the citizens were expected to adapt to the logic of urban planning which already existed in the city bureaucracy [[Co-creation of a sustainable neighborhood in Freiburg#23. What obstacles to implementing the intervention (both generally, and in this particular context) have been identified, relating to:\|(Q23)]].

	Learn more about this intervention:		Learn more about this intervention:

Sophia McRae at 09:20, 4 March 2021

2021-03-04T09:20:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:20, 4 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|400x400x\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]		[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|400x400x\|thumb\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]

	Examples from real world governance interventions:		Examples from real world governance interventions:

Sophia McRae at 09:19, 4 March 2021

2021-03-04T09:19:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:19, 4 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|~~1000x1000x~~\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]		[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|400x400x\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]

	Examples from real world governance interventions:		Examples from real world governance interventions:

Sophia McRae at 09:19, 4 March 2021

2021-03-04T09:19:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:19, 4 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|1000x1000x~~\|thumb~~\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]		[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|1000x1000x\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]

	Examples from real world governance interventions:		Examples from real world governance interventions:

Sophia McRae at 09:19, 4 March 2021

2021-03-04T09:19:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:19, 4 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|~~600x600x~~\|thumb\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]		[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|1000x1000x\|thumb\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]

	Examples from real world governance interventions:		Examples from real world governance interventions:

Sophia McRae at 09:19, 4 March 2021

2021-03-04T09:19:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:19, 4 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|~~400x400x~~\|thumb\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]		[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|600x600x\|thumb\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]

	Examples from real world governance interventions:		Examples from real world governance interventions:

Sophia McRae at 09:19, 4 March 2021

2021-03-04T09:19:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:19, 4 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|~~200x200x~~\|thumb\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]		[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|400x400x\|thumb\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]

	Examples from real world governance interventions:		Examples from real world governance interventions:

Sophia McRae at 12:59, 25 February 2021

2021-02-25T12:59:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:59, 25 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[File:3 Build bridges.jpg.jpeg\|200x200x\|thumb\|Build Bridges between Separate Stakeholder Groups]]

	Examples from real world governance interventions:		Examples from real world governance interventions: